homepuppet vs ansible for continuous compliance
hero puppet ansible  update

Ansible vs Puppet for continuous compliance

Puppet Enterprise puts two types of automation in your hands: desired state automation and task-based automation, while Ansible offers only task-based automation. When it comes to enforcing compliance with security and operations policies for thousands of systems, desired state automation is simpler, more reliable, and ultimately less expensive than task automation.
Download the solution brief 
Man on phone with task icon

Understanding desired state and task-based automation

The flexibility and free availability of task-based automation makes it a tempting option. Ansible playbooks or Puppet plans can orchestrate tasks for a wide variety of on-premises and cloud infrastructure operations.

However, maintaining desired state in heterogeneous operating systems and middleware environments with thousands of systems can quickly become tedious and complex. Operators end up expending more effort maintaining automation tools rather than system state – with no significant savings.

With Puppet, just a few lines of desired state code can do the work of tens or even hundreds of lines of playbook commands and logic. Puppet is designed to keep systems in desired state, reliably and securely, without any additional effort. That means your security teams, as well as auditors, clearly see configuration policies and how they’re enforced.

Man on phone with task icon

Comparing Ansible and Puppet for automation

While Ansible’s task automation alone can be valuable, when it comes to enforcing continuous compliance at scale and staying audit ready, desired state automation is the way to go. Check out the comparison below, and download our solution brief to learn more.

Continuous Compliance EnforcementDesired State ConfigurationTask Automation
Continuous agent-based enforcement and verification of security and operations policiesYesNo
Built-in self-healing infrastructure capabilities to avoid manual drift remediation of operating system and middleware configurationsYesNo
Human readable policy as code accelerates collaboration and alignment with security teamsYesNo
Infrastructure as code capabilities to remediate and deploy security policy updates to thousands of servers in minutes across cloud regions and data centersYesNo
Ability to quickly scan thousands of nodes to prioritize which CIS Benchmark standards to remediateYesNo
Continuously hardens systems using the latest CIS Benchmark standards frequently used by security teams and auditors for compliance with PCIYesNo
Automatically translates each declarative policy as code statement into tens or hundreds of steps in the right sequence to reduce operator effort and errorYesNo
Self-service compliant builds maintain state to promote test-to-production consistency and avoid the wait for manual security reviewsYesNo
Idempotent by design to eliminate complex workarounds and minimize CPU and network overheadYesNo
Continuous Audit ReadinessDesired State ConfigurationTask Automation
Human readable, agent-enforced policy as code accepted as compliance evidence by auditorsYesNo
Ability to quickly scan thousands of nodes to prioritize which CIS Benchmark standards to remediateYesNo
Continuous estate-wide transparency into security and compliance postureYesNo
Built-in configuration reporting for fast audit preparationYes No